South Texas

Safe Water Project

A partnership between Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas and Texas A&M University School of Public Health.

Safe Water Starts Here

Turning on the tap shouldn’t feel like a gamble, but that’s the reality for many families living in South Texas colonias. Generations of inadequate infrastructure and unsafe drinking water have created serious health challenges for these underserved communities.

Learn how the South Texas Water Project is combining research, community partnerships and advocacy to improve water quality and ensure every family has access to safe drinking water.

Download the full REPORT

Over the span of 2.5 years, Methodist Healthcare Ministries and Texas A&M University partnered with residents in the Progreso and Alamo colonias to investigate the community’s water quality and environmental concerns, and to better understand how drinking water impacts health. The study revealed contaminants, including uranium, arsenic, nickel, and lead, in local water samples and uncovered elevated rates of chronic health conditions. The results gave us valuable insight that will help shape future efforts and improve access to safe drinking water.

Download the full report to explore the findings, methodology, and recommendations for improving environmental and public health across Texas.

Download PDF
Executive Summary

The South Texas Safe Water Project, a partnership between Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas, Inc. (MHM) and Texas A&M University School of Public Health, addressed critical environmental and public health issues in colonia communities along the US-Mexico border.

Key Findings

Uranium, nickel, and arsenic were detected in 100% of potable water samples, posing severe health risks, including cancer and developmental delays.

Despite fines imposed on water providers for EPA violations, many continued non-compliance, indicating the need for stronger enforcement mechanisms and consistent monitoring.

Methodology

Community Engagement Approach

The engagement strategy for the project was built on the principles of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR), prioritizing shared ownership, collaboration, and respect for local expertise. This philosophy emphasized creating a reciprocal relationship with the community, valuing their knowledge, and involving them directly in shaping the research process. By integrating the trusted voices of Promotoras, Community Advisory Boards (CABs), and several local nonprofit organizations, the approach ensured culturally relevant engagement and deepened the connection between the research team and the residents.

Impact on Research Outcomes and Data Collection

The community engagement approach significantly enhanced the quality and relevance of the research outcomes. By involving CABs, Promotoras, and nonprofit partners throughout the project, the team was able to gather more accurate, context-specific data that directly reflected the community’s needs and concerns.

Data Analysis Techniques

Metallomic Profiling in Toenails

Urinary Arsenic Analysis and Intervention

Nutritional Status and Arsenic Metabolism

Download Full Methodology Report

Data Collection Methods

Phase 1

Community-based
Participatory Research

Participant Recruitment Administration

Survey Administration

Onsite Water Testing & Additional Water Sample

Intervention Items & Stipends

Phase 2

Community-based
Participatory Research

Collection of Biomarker Samples (Urine, Toenail, & Dry Blood)

Baseline & Follow-Up Dietary Consumption Surveys

Participant Certificate of Acknowledgment & Stipends

Results

Participant Engagement & Retention

BIOMONITORING — ARESENIC

These results highlight the findings from biomarker assessments, revealing what was present within participants’ bodies.

Notably, there was a significant reduction in the number of individuals in the high-risk category following the implementation of filtered water provided to participants.

Perceived Health Status

The results from the mental and physical health assessment reveal a statistically significant reduction in physical health compared to county and state averages.

Conclusion

PROJECT EXPANSION

Expanding the program across additional counties in South Texas is a critical next step to address the region’s diverse environmental and public health challenges.